Conceptually the word 'Assemblage' means to gather everything together as a
whole, to convey particular meaning to the public. In this process, it must
involve actants to activate the performance in order to extend further
actions constantly. In other words, actants potentially cause repetitive making
and re-making and eventually it comes to the final result after everything has
done its job by adding certain effects. However, we cannot see how each of the
actant induces the subsequent movement, only if we theorise this process,
extracting the key elements from this involvement. Actor-network theory
externalises this perspective and that reflects the networks of relation
coherently and how this affects social relations.
Theoretically, actants can
be classfied as human and non-human actors, they both distribute partially
during the production in this process. There is no such a difference when we
talk about human factors and non human factors in this theory as they contribute,
act, engage equally, the interaction has no hierarchy. That means, every factor
virtually is a small component react and cause change to other components, to
make up the whole complex system rather than competing against each other to
create conflicts.
The quote has taken from
Wikipedia sums up the whole point:
ANT is often associated with the equal treatment of human and non-human actors. ANT assumes that all entities in a network can and should be described in the same terms. This is called the principle of generalized symmetry.
It's like
a teamwork that things connect and exist or possibly dependent on each other,
namely 'flat
ontology'
The other
term 'Latour Litany' demonstrates the same semiotic meaning, it
has taken from Bruno Latour's book, Politics
of Nature. The central idea of the book implicitly conveys the same idea of
the Actor-network theory. His book focuses on the creation of assemblies and
collectives all around our nature and the very basis of our lives.
Other than that, according to Manuel
DeLanda's theory, he suggested that all the matters are rational decisions made
by individual persons in isolation from one another. Also each entity's
capabilities are as real as its properties. 'Assemblage', in other words,
constitutes by heterogenous lower-level assemblages. The theory advocates that
entities always results in "populations", in a sense of forming a
society. So when we use the term 'society', we are not talking about in a
broader sense of totality, but it's considered to be the relations of all atomy
is happening in any actual occasions. They are capable to produce temporality
and spaciality and bounded to demonstrate 'flat ontology', this principle to
higher level of realism.
Interestingly, in my own understanding of the
term 'assemblage' could be the patterns that carries an artistic value. To get
rid of the boredom from reading so many texts, i searched for a few images to
further analyse the core idea:
So when we see publishing as an assemblage, there are three layers should be included in this process which are:
- the invention of the printing press, materials are texts, images, painting etc
- the advent technology influences enormous changes, such technological devices are ipad, ereaders etc actively updates a newer version of publishing
- following by the development of digital changes, publishing becomes more well known by a wider range of audience in different fields, hence we have a stronger intention to adapt to the new contents produced by new environments
The following video provides a further demonstration of the Actor-network theory, in brief, this system is an unbreakable chain that each actant intertwines one another.
References
Actor-Network Rochambeau,<http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/actor-network-rochambeau/>
DeLanda, A New Philosophy of Society, The Pinocchio Theory,<http://www.shaviro.com/Blog/?p=541>